Case Results

  • $1.3 Billion Automobile Defect
    In re Kia Engine Litigation., No. 8:17-cv-00838-JLS-JDE (C.D. Cal.) (served as co-lead counsel in an automobile defect case and reached a nationwide settlement valued at $1.3 billion on behalf of owners and lessees of certain Hyundai and Kia vehicles)
  • $50 Million Class Action Against Falsely Advertised Holographic Weapons Sights

    Foster, Andrew Tyler et al. v. L-3 Communications EOTECH, Inc., et al., Case No. 15-cv-03519 (W.D. Mo.)(served as co-lead counsel and obtained more than $50 million dollars in monetary relief for consumers who purchased falsely advertised holographic weapons sights)

  • $30 Million Product Liability Verdict
  • Over $10 Million in Damages Defective Acetylene Gas Cylinders

    Won defense verdict on behalf of a leading chemical company in a trial that involved over $10 million in damages as a result of an explosion allegedly caused by defective acetylene gas cylinders.

  • $9.8 Million Settlement on Behalf of Unpaid National & NY Class of Employees

    Griffin, Anthony, et al., v. Aldi, Inc., Doe Defendants 1-10, Case No. 16-cv-00354 (N.D.N.Y.)(served as co-lead counsel and obtained a settlement fund of $9.8 million on behalf of a national and NY class of employees who were not paid for all of the hours they worked and who did not receive appropriate overtime under federal and NY law)

  • $8.8 Million Settlement Fund on Behalf Of Students Who Paid Tuition for in Person Classes During COVID

    Arrendondo, Brianna v. The University of La Verne, Case No. 2:20-cv-07665 (C.D.C.A.) (served as co-lead counsel and obtained a settlement fund of $8,895,759.00 on behalf of college students who paid tuition for in-person classes during the COVID pandemic)

  • $6.5 Million National class of consumers who purchased dietary supplements alleged to have been deceptively labeled

    Susan Swetz, et al. v. GSK Consumer Health, Inc., Case No. 7:20-cv-04731 (S.D.N.Y). Served as co-lead counsel and obtained a settlement fund of $6.5 million and injunctive relief in the form of label modifications on behalf of a national class of consumers who purchased dietary supplements alleged to have been deceptively labeled.

  • $5.6 Million Class Action Against Deceptively Labeled Clorox Products

    Bryan Swetz v. The Clorox Company, Case No. 7:22-cv-9374 (S.D.N.Y) (served as co-lead counsel and obtained a settlement fund of $5.65 million on behalf of a national class of consumers who purchased deceptively labeled products alleged to have been contaminated with bacteria)

  • $5.6 Million Settlement on Behalf of Consumers Overcharged for Patent Renewal Services

    Run Them Sweet, LLC v. CPA Global, Ltd., et al, Case No. 1:16-cv-1347 (E.D. VA.)(served as co-lead counsel and obtained a settlement fund of $5.6 million on behalf of consumers who were overcharged with respect to foreign patent renewal services)

1 / 12